Monday, August 27, 2007

Soccer in America


MLS - Worthy or Worthless?
By Abigail Richards




In surfing the web these past few months, I've noticed numerous article
s cropping up on football journalism websites about the impact of David Beckham on 'soccer' in America. Essentially you can split these articles right down the middle and divide them up into two categories. Those who think Beckham will do more for soccer than Pélé in the 1970s, and those who think he's a washed-up, overpaid moron.

Personally I'm not one for making judgments on someone so early. It's impossible to tell what kind of impact Beckham and the many others who have arrived in MLS (Major League Soccer) thanks to the 'Beckham rule' or more accurately, the designated player (DP) rule, until at the very earliest the end of the current season. Then and only then can any kind of conclusions be drawn.

Initial signs are at least fairly positive. A massive 66,237 crowd at the Giants Stadium saw Juan Pablo Angel (formerly of Aston Villa) and the rest of the New York Red Bulls overcome Beckham's LA Galaxy by 5 goals to 4. These are the kind of soccer matches the American fans like to see. High-scoring, high-tempo affairs. Let's not forget that in the majority of other sports involving a ball, scoring often reaches double figures for both sides. For fans brought up on American football and basketball, watching two soccer teams grind out a 0-0 draw is not what appeals.

The crowd, many of whom were no doubt attending their first MLS match, were highly entertained as Beckham played his part in three of Galaxy's four goals, but was overcome by the talented attacking pair of veteran Angel and 17-year-old sensation Jozy Altidore, both of whom grabbed a brace. This was the largest crowd for an MLS regular season game at the Giants Stadium, and proof that the Beckham factor is enough to get peoples' bums on seats, but this is an isolated incident. Giants Stadium (above) in East Rutherford,, N.J. is one of the largest stadiums used by MLS and is traditionally home to the New York Giants and the New York Jets, teams in the NFL. Many clubs now use soccer-specific stadiums with capacities of around 20,000. The Red Bulls themselves will move to Red Bull Park within the next year. With a capacity of 25,000, it's more on-par with an average English Championship ground, meaning that this could very well be one of the last 60,000-plus attendances for the forseeable future.

So what of the future of MLS? The 2007 season saw the expansion of the Eastern Conference to include a new franchise; Toronto FC, the first Canadian team to play in MLS. Despite their relative poor form (they won just 5 of their opening 22 matches) they've gained a large number of supporters in Toronto, leading to the suggestion that another Canadian team should join MLS, most likely to be the Vancouver Whitecaps (badge left); current champions of the USL First Division, the second tier of soccer in America and Canada. Next season will see the return of the San Jose Earthquakes, one of the teams that dominated MLS in its early years before the franchise was placed on hiatus and the team, players and all were moved to Houston to become the Dynamo. The expansion to 14 clubs may be seen as the way forward, but there are some pitfalls that need to be considered.

Firstly, over-expansion was one of the major contributing factors to the decline of the NASL (North American Soccer League). Following the success of the New York Cosmos with players in their team like Pélé and Beckenbauer, many businessmen saw soccer as a way to make a quick buck and started opening franchises all over the United States and Canada. At its highest, there were 24 teams competing in the NASL. This resulted in the overall talent being spread too thinly between the sides competing, leading to the clubs having to spend big on foreign aging stars. When the money dried up, businessmen dumped their franchises just as quickly as they'd set them up. The league folded in 1984.

While precautions have certainly been taken to assure that the same thing doesn't happen to MLS, the decision to expand to 14 teams in 2008, with future expansion in the works, has similar pitfalls. MLS teams don't have youth teams. They can't go out and scout the country looking for the best players to play for them. They rely on players gaining experience in the USL Premier Development League (PDL), usually while they work their way through college, before they're drafted to MLS teams once they come of age. This is the same way in which other American sports function, such as American football, baseball and basketball, where the most promising players coming out of college are snapped up on muli-million dollar deals.

The same cannot be said for young soccer players. It's nice work if you can get it, but you only get it if you're good enough. Every year, a certain amount of players are selected to be Generation Adidas players. The aim of this initiative is to encourage early entry (without college graduation) of American players into MLS. These players are few and far between. There were eight players who were awarded Generation Adidas status for 2007, not even enough to go around the present 13 teams. If the league continues to expand, it corresponds that the amount of young American/Canadian talent will have to increase at the same time. Otherwise MLS clubs will be forced to look outside of the US for talent, which as a by product will stifle youth progression further.

The MLS is unique in world football. It functions differently to any other league and in the ten years since its inception it has steadily developed into the entity we know it as now. The standard of football has improved, and with the arrival of Beckham (left) and his fellow DPs, crowds are seemingly on the rise too. But the most important factor for progression, as any football coach will tell you, is development at a grass roots level. If more teenagers opt to play soccer as opposed to football, basketball, hockey or baseball, then the standard of the MLS and in turn the US national team will continue to improve. Otherwise the league should not look to expand any further than it already has, lest we end up with another NASL situation.

The Job of a Referee


The Toughest Job In Football?
By Abigail Richards




Did it cross the line or didn't it? Penalty or no penalty? Was it a handball or not? We've been hearing plenty from the Premiership about bad refereeing decisions. And I bet everyone thought that was over the day Graham Poll announced he was hanging up his whistle.

High profile "mistakes" by Rob Styles (Liverpool vs. Chelsea), Lee Mason (Fulham vs. Middlesbrough) and Howard Webb (Manchester United vs. Tottenham) have lead to wide-spread complaints that refereeing in England's top league is not up to a good enough standard. Styles was even dropped from the referee list for this weekend's match program, which was dismissed as routine by referee's chief Keith Hackett, who told BBC Radio 5live that "It is just like with players, if they miss an open goal they are likely to be dropped."

I have to say that it's not the same thing. Yes, Styles made a refereeing error, but the solution is not to drop him and hope that he learns his lesson. Referees aren't players. Players are dropped when they're losing form or struggling from injuries, and usually return to the side when they've recovered. But Styles (left, with the infuriated Liverpool players) didn't suffer a loss of form, he made an error in his judgment. And who can blame him? With Chelsea's players surrounding him insisting it was a penalty, and the intense atmosphere of a buzzing Anfield, can anyone honestly say they wouldn't have done the same thing?

Sure, it could be argued that referees are paid to handle the pressures of taking charge of the big matches, but they're not machines. They don't have built-in goal-line technologies and can't rely on television replays before their decisions are made final. Like it or not, the referee and his assistants assume total control when they step out onto the field. They're trusted to do their jobs and should not be dropped for making bad decisions.

Instead more help and support should be given to the men in black. They do, I would argue, have the toughest job in football. Neither set of fans particularly like you and you're just as scrutinized (and possibly more so) if you make an error as any of the 22 players on the field. I for one am not totally convinced that goal-line technology is the answer, but surely there is more that can be done rather than 'dropping' the referee for a week? What does that achieve other than humiliating those who make the mistake? They're already practically forced into apologising and then after they do so they're told that they won't be able to do their jobs the following week. This is not the way to go about things.

Referees do not receive enough protection when they make these alleged "mistakes". Do we really want another Anders Frisk situation? Frisk (right) was the referee for the Champions' League clash between Chelsea and Barcelona a couple of years ago. After a match where none of his decisions were incorrect, at least according to the chairman of Sweden's football referees' association Bo Karlsson, Frisk and his family received numerous death threats and he decided enough was enough. This was not an isolated incident however. Frisk was also struck on the head by an object thrown from the crowd at Roma's Olympic Stadium during a Champions League match against Dynamo Kiev the previous September. UEFA punished Roma, but clearly the situation was no better 5 months on at Stamford Bridge.

On that occasion what did UEFA do? They blamed Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho. They declared him the "enemy of football" as they pleaded Frisk to reconsider. Unsurprisingly Frisk did not change his mind. In a game where players are coddled and outspoken managers revered by their fans, the men in black are the outcasts, quite literally cast aside when they do something wrong. Along with working on goal-line technology, the FA, UEFA and FIFA should be doing everything they can to help out the men with the undoubted toughest job in football.

The Season Ahead


Scottish Football in 2007/08
by Abigail Richards



The season may only be four games old but already I can see Rangers and Celtic running away with it once again. Total domination seems likely after last week, when Rangers hit seven against Falkirk who managed ju
st two in reply. That was followed up by Celtic hitting Hearts for five this weekend, this time with no response from a lackluster Gorgie side who look a shadow of their side of two years ago.

Rangers spent big this summer, with David Murray announcing that around £13million was spent with only £2million coming in. With that sort of spending, Rangers fans will be expecting success of some form. Another trophyless season will no doubt be unacceptable for the Ibrox faithful and I suspect they just might have it in them to take the title back from their neighbours. Their signings have impressed, and perhaps more vitally, Walter Smith has managed to dispose of practically all the remnants of Paul Le Guen's ill-fated tenure. Daniel Cousin and Jean-Claude Darcheville look good up front, DaMarcus Beasley (above) looks lively either up front or on the wing, and Carlos Cuellar looks class at the back. Add in the Scottish additions of Kirk Broadfoot, Steven Whittaker and Graeme Smith, and Smith's 27-man squad look very impressive.

Celtic have bought well too. Massimo Donati looks like he has the required attributes to replace Neil Lennon in midfield, and Scott Brown has to be one of the most exciting youngsters to come out of Scotland for a long time. His £4.5million price tag may be steep, but I feel he has it in him to live up to the tag and not fade away into the background at Parkhead, like his former Hibs teammate Derek Riordan.

And what of Hearts? Gone from their Scottish Cup winning side are Pressley, Hartley, Skacel and most importantly of all, Craig Gordon (left). It remains to be seen if Hearts will actually spend any of the reported £7million received from Sunderland, but if they're going to even match last season's fourth place finish, they'll surely have to. It will infuriate the fans if the only reinforcements brought in following Gordon's departure are another gaggle of Lithuanians who'd struggle in the Scottish First Division. Perhaps most important to Hearts' hopes is to find a strong leader in the dugout. Coach Stephen Frail has admitted that there needs to be a stronger voice barking orders to his players. And with days till the end of the transfer window it seems unlikely that anyone will be put in place in time to make any kind of impact.

Last season's third placed team are also struggling. Like Hearts, Aberdeen lost their best player to Sunderland. But unlike their rivals, they were not quite so handsomely compensated. Russell Anderson (right, in red) fetched just £1million. A price that no doubt reflects the former skipper's inability to fight his way into the Scotland starting XI. Given that Anderson was given a start against South Africa at Pittodrie last week despite hardly featuring for Sunderland so far this term, many Aberdeen fans (myself included) will be feeling that it's not how well you're playing, it's who you're playing for. And these days, if you're not in the Premiership or playing in Glasgow or Edinburgh, your chances of making it into the Scotland first team are slim. Craig Brewster has undoubtedly been Aberdeen's strongest player in the opening four matches, and his imminent return to Inverness means that surely the two Jimmys will need to step up their search for a striker, with just five more days till September.

Hibernian look to be the best bet to finish 'best of the rest'. Some shrewd summer signings seem to have made up for the fact that they lost the majority of their best players over the summer, with Chris Killen and Scott Brown making their way to Celtic, and Steven Whittaker arriving at Rangers. Yves Makaba-Makalambay is a giant between the sticks and should provide them with the stability they lacked in goal last term. Much will be expected of young Steven Fletcher (above), who will be looking to make up for a poor U20 World Cup display in Canada by getting in amongst the goals. Clayton Donaldson is the only major arrival up front and he will have the task of replacing the influential Killen. Despite some major personnel changes, I back Hibs for a third place finish.

And what of the rest? Kilmarnock will surely be expecting another top six finish after seemingly managing to hold onto Steven Naismith for yet another transfer window. Their fans will surely be hoping he doesn't turn into another Kris Boyd, who left the club for a miserly £400,000 in January 2006 as his contract ran down. Naismith is a more complete player than Boyd, and must surely be worth more than the reported £1.5million Rangers et al have reportedly been offering.

Dundee United will have hopes of a top six finish too. After an excellent start to the season Craig Levein's men look better than they ever have in recent years. They were unlucky against Kilmarnock following a dodgy red card shown to Christian Kalvenes and they were very impressive against Aberdeen and Inverness. Expect them to be mid-table and pushing for higher by the end of the season.

Motherwell have also had a good start and under new manager Mark McGhee could be the surprise package of the season. McGhee has made some good signings and the side look far more organised than they did under Maurice Malpas last season.

Falkirk, St. Mirren, Inverness and Gretna will no doubt form their own 'mini-league' of relegation candidates this season. Of the four, Falkirk and St. Mirren look the most likely to secure their places in the top flight for another year. Inverness will hope the imminent return of Craig Brewster (right) to the dugout, and possibly the pitch, will inspire them to their first victory of the season. But sorry Gretna don't look like an SPL side. They haven't bought well and the confusion over who exactly is manager won't be helping matters any. Providing Inverness sort themselves out, Gretna will no doubt go back down where they came from at the season's end.

My predictions:

1. Rangers
2. Celtic
3. Hibs
4. Aberdeen
5. Hearts
6. Kilmarnock
7. Dundee United
8. Motherwell
9. St. Mirren
10. Falkirk
11. Inverness CT
12. Gretna

CIS Cup: Hibernian
Scottish Cup: Celtic